Keyword: bin Laden

An Unholy Triangle: George Bush, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and al Qaeda Email Print

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The topic below was originally posted on my blog the Intrepid Liberal Journal as well as The Peace Tree, the Independent Bloggers Alliance and Worldwide Sawdust.

Foreign Affairs published a sobering article by Bruce Riedel in their May/June issue entitled, "al Qaeda Strikes Back." Riedel, a Senior Fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution retired last year after 29 years with the CIA.

Wait... There's more! (999 words in story)

Our Enemies' Nicknames Email Print

Our enemies have convenient names for their nicknames. Like: Saddam Insane; Kim Jong Mentally-il; and Loony Bin Laden. Now there is another to add to the list...

Wait... There's more! (77 words in story)

Cornered. CIA speaks [Dec. 2001] Email Print

2 CIA officials tell us Washington –twice– declined to send the reinforcements they asked for when bin Laden was cornered in Afghanistan in 2001.  By the time of the 2nd request by the CIA for troops, the special ops force could hear Osama on radio asking his followers for forgiveness for leading them to their imminent capture.  It was that close.

From Gary Bernsten, who led the CIA's paramilitary unit chasing bin Laden after he fled from Kabul (Christiane Amanpour interviewed him on CNN) –

AMANPOUR:  ... the CIA was sure it knew where he was, thanks in large part to a radio taken off a dead al Qaeda fighter.

BERNTSEN: We listened to bin Laden for several days using that radio, listened to his communications among him and his men. We listened to him apologize to them for having led them  –
          [-- crossposted at dailykos --]

Wait... There's more! (578 words in story)

Bush thinks Seattle-area peace activists are terrorists. Email Print

More evidence has surfaced that Bush was not sincere when he said that we must fight a war against terror and that the war can be won and must be won. Most of us know about the UAE port deal with a country whose royal family once sheltered Bin Laden from a CIA attack that would have killed him. But there is another piece of evidence that Bush is not sincere when talks about terrorists - he considers peace activists to be terrorists.

Most of us would think of terrorists as people like Bin Laden whose purpose is to kill innocent civilians at random for political purposes. But not Bush. He thinks that anybody who expresses their First-Amendment right to dissent from the President's policies is a terrorist and must be tracked as much as possible. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer link provides a list of Washington-area peace groups who have been spied on by the Bush administration.

Wait... There's more! (2 comments, 1487 words in story)

bin Laden fuels the fear, paves the way for banishing our Civil Liberties Email Print

So, Osama made another speech and stated the obvious: He's still alive and still a threat because Bush got us all involved with this distraction in Iraq which has done more for Al Qaeda than it's done for us. And the GOP reaction, of course, is to show how serious they are about terrorism by attacking Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean and other Democrats or liberals.

Wait... There's more! (5 comments, 662 words in story)

Prepare for the Inevitable Attack Email Print

No, not from bin Laden, from Republicans who will inevitably politicize Osama's message to perpetuate the lie that members of the American anti-war majority are terrorist-coddling appeasers.

"Oh!" they'll whine, "See what the 'blame-America-first' crowd is doing. They're coddling the enemy. They're providing loving, nurturing support for the terrorists. It's time they shut their mouths and support our president. There's no room for political dissent in America anymore."

Inevitably, they'll quote bin Laden:

...I plan to speak about the repeated errors your President Bush has committed in comments on the results of your polls that show an overwhelming majority of you want the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. But he (Bush) has opposed this wish and said that withdrawing troops sends the wrong message to opponents...

"Doesn't get any clearer than that!"

Already the stream of debris is flowing. Here's a tiny sampling:

Wait... There's more! (6 comments, 702 words in story)

Do we really want to find these guys? Email Print

Does the US really want to find Zarqawi or

Bin Laden?  I say the following using BASIC LOGIC, WHICH IS SORELY LACKING IN AMERICANS THESE DAYS.  With the American govt. and the American military basically in control of the world, there is no way we could not find top leaders supposedly hiding out in apartments and caves.  Thus, the only logical explanation for this "failure" is that either we do not wish to find these characters (and you fill in the whys), or they do not really even exist anymore!

An entire diary or front page article should be done on this topic, as I believe this entire issue is really just the recurrent bogeyman-fear theme that the Repubs constantly seem to need to control many Americans (communism, Vietnam, terrorism, child kidnapping and on an on).  What does that say about many of us?

Discuss