Some  of you have asked me,  how I write my health care catastrophe diaries?

I explained that I get up in the morning and search. My job is to find and describe the outrage or the assault of the day. Some days there are so many, I have a hard time deciding among the worst.

Yesterday morning it was easy. The outrage of the day is smack on the cover of the New York Times Magazine.

And it's a bad one.

The cover story is called, Contra-Contraception you can read it here:

http://www.nytimes.com/...

Take a breath and read on.

In a full frontal assault on the Woman's Rights Movement, Missouri Republicans have stripped funds for birth control from its budget. Birth control pioneer, Margaret Sanger (left), must be turning in her grave.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - An attempt to resume state spending on birth control got shot down Wednesday by House members who argued it would have amounted to an endorsement of promiscuous lifestyles.

Missouri stopped providing money for family planning and certain women's health services when Republicans gained control of both chambers of the Legislature in 2003.

But a Democratic lawmaker, in a little-noticed committee amendment, had successfully inserted language into the proposed budget for the fiscal year starting July 1 that would have allowed part of the $9.2 million intended for "core public health functions" to go to contraception provided through public health clinics.

The House voted 96-59 to delete the funding for contraception and infertility treatments after Rep. Susan Phillips told lawmakers that anti-abortion groups such as Missouri Right to Life were opposed to the spending.

"If you hand out contraception to single women, we're saying promiscuity is OK as a state, and I am not in support of that," Phillips, R-Kansas City, said in an interview.

They are attempting to legislate health care and personal choice in the name of morality. Red State Government at its finest.