I have a master and a development branch, both pushed to GitHub. I've cloned, pulled, and fetched, but I remain unable to get anything other than the master branch back.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, but I have read the manual and I'm getting no joy at all.

  • 110
    The accepted answer here (git branch -a) shows you the branches in the remote, but if you attempt to check any of those out you will be in a 'detached HEAD' state. The next answer down (second most upvotes) answers a different question (to wit: how to pull all branches, and, again, this only works for those you're tracking locally). Several of the comments point out that you could parse the git branch -a results with a shell script that would locally track all the remote branches. Summary: There's no git native way to do what you want and it might not be all that great an idea anyway. – Day Davis Waterbury Jun 18 '12 at 22:43
  • 5
    Maybe just copy the entire folder the old fashioned way? scp some_user@example.com:/home/some_user/project_folder ~ Not sure if that solution works for github though.. – snapfractalpop Sep 26 '12 at 22:51
  • 16
    Rather than saying "I've cloned, pulled, and fetched," much better to show us the exact commands that you executed. – Bob Gilmore Nov 22 '13 at 18:17
  • 38
    It always boggles me why "clone" isn't in the sense of an exact copy. If it's an exact clone, shouldn't all the branches be part of the local repository? I mean isn't that one of the point of being distributed? So when something repository is gone you still have a complete copy of everything. Or is it the so called "remote" really are part of the local repository already? – huggie Jul 11 '16 at 6:31
  • 13
    Seeing all the upvotes, answers, comments on answers and the mind-boggling number of views, I think it is time git added a command for doing this. And right you are @huggie, my thoughts exactly. – Sнаđошƒаӽ Aug 29 '16 at 4:29

35 Answers 35

up vote 4033 down vote accepted

First, clone a remote Git repository and cd into it:

$ git clone git://example.com/myproject
$ cd myproject

Next, look at the local branches in your repository:

$ git branch
* master

But there are other branches hiding in your repository! You can see these using the -a flag:

$ git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD
  remotes/origin/master
  remotes/origin/v1.0-stable
  remotes/origin/experimental

If you just want to take a quick peek at an upstream branch, you can check it out directly:

$ git checkout origin/experimental

But if you want to work on that branch, you'll need to create a local tracking branch which is done automatically by:

$ git checkout experimental

and you will see

Branch experimental set up to track remote branch experimental from origin.
Switched to a new branch 'experimental'

That last line throws some people: "New branch" - huh? What it really means is that the branch is taken from the index and created locally for you. The previous line is actually more informative as it tells you that the branch is being set up to track the remote branch, which usually means the origin/branch_name branch

Now, if you look at your local branches, this is what you'll see:

$ git branch
* experimental
  master

You can actually track more than one remote repository using git remote.

$ git remote add win32 git://example.com/users/joe/myproject-win32-port
$ git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD
  remotes/origin/master
  remotes/origin/v1.0-stable
  remotes/origin/experimental
  remotes/win32/master
  remotes/win32/new-widgets

At this point, things are getting pretty crazy, so run gitk to see what's going on:

$ gitk --all &
  • 94
    How can someone create automatically all the remote branches, e.g. experimental for origin/experimental? – Cristian Ciupitu Jun 4 '09 at 16:33
  • 47
    Cristian: I used to always create a branch 'foo' for every branch 'origin/foo', but this led to two problems: (1) I wound up with lots of really stale tracking branches that were many commits behind the corresponding remote branch, and (2) in older versions of git, running 'git push' would attempt to push all my local branches to a remote, even when those branches were stale. So now I only keep local branches for things that I'm actively developing, and access the origin/* branches directly if I need information about them. (That said, you could use a shell script to parse 'git branch -a'.) – emk Jul 20 '09 at 21:44
  • 46
    "git fetch <origin-name> <branch-name>" brings the branch down locally for you. – Orange Box Feb 7 '10 at 17:10
  • 110
    Good answer, but kinda misses the question. I was looking for a one-liner to checkout all the remote branches. – cmcginty Oct 19 '10 at 21:01
  • 29
    The question was about cloning all remote branches, not checking them out. And, as I noted above, you really don't want to make any more local tracking branches than necessary, because when they get really stale, they can cause headaches. – emk Oct 28 '10 at 12:43

If you have many remote branches that you want to fetch at once, do:

$ git pull --all

Now you can checkout any branch as you need to, without hitting the remote repository.

  • 7
    If I do git clone, I have the master branch locally and 10 branches "remote". So THIS answer by Gabe was very helpful and answers the question. – basZero Jan 27 '12 at 19:07
  • 19
    this only fetch remote branches that have been locally added not any remote branch – jujule Feb 10 '12 at 11:45
  • 29
    The first command is redundant. Simply git pull --all will do the same – it just won't fetch twice. And infosec812 is right that this does not answer the question anyway. I wonder how this got so many upvotes. – Sven Marnach Apr 6 '12 at 14:03
  • 6
    After I did git remote update, then tried git branch, I only see local branches. But if I do git branch -a I can now see the remote branches and I can do a git pull <branchname> to get the branch I want. -- I landed on this question from a Google search, and this answer solves my problem. – Jazzerus Jan 31 '13 at 16:47
  • 14
    This is not helpful at all, doesn't pull any remote branches other than that is existing. – Avinash R Apr 11 '13 at 15:02

This Bash script helped me out:

#!/bin/bash
for branch in $(git branch --all | grep '^\s*remotes' | egrep --invert-match '(:?HEAD|master)$'); do
    git branch --track "${branch##*/}" "$branch"
done

It will create tracking branches for all remote branches, except master (which you probably got from the original clone command). I think you might still need to do a

git fetch --all
git pull --all

to be sure.

One liner: git branch -a | grep -v HEAD | perl -ne 'chomp($_); s|^\*?\s*||; if (m|(.+)/(.+)| && not $d{$2}) {print qq(git branch --track $2 $1/$2\n)} else {$d{$_}=1}' | csh -xfs As usual: test in your setup before copying rm -rf universe as we know it

Credits for one-liner go to user cfi

  • 13
    This is really close to being a perfect solution.. The only thing that would make it better is if this functionality were built-in as an option in git. – Deven Phillips Oct 27 '11 at 17:15
  • 40
    "One liner": git branch -a | grep -v HEAD | perl -ne 'chomp($_); s|^\*?\s*||; if (m|(.+)/(.+)| && not $d{$2}) {print qq(git branch --track $2 $1/$2\n)} else {$d{$_}=1}' | csh -xfs As usual: test in your setup before copying rm -rf universe as we know it – cfi Sep 18 '12 at 12:38
  • 3
    This command creates the feature branches from remote as normal branches (not feature branches) - how to fix this? – Alex2php Mar 20 '14 at 14:31
  • 3
    if you run into issues with "/" in branch names there is a solution below using a git alias. see answer by "nobody" on "answered May 15 '13 at 11:02" – wemu Jan 12 '15 at 11:54
  • 6
    I'm trimming just remotes/origin/ to preserve namespaces: for BRANCH in $(git branch -a | grep remotes | grep -v HEAD | grep -v master); do git branch --track "${BRANCH#remotes/origin/}" "${BRANCH}"; done – kgadek Jul 2 '15 at 8:33

Using the --mirror option seems to copy the remote tracking branches properly. However, it sets up the repository as a bare repository, so you have to turn it back into a normal repository afterwards.

git clone --mirror path/to/original path/to/dest/.git
cd path/to/dest
git config --bool core.bare false
git checkout anybranch

Reference: Git FAQ: How do I clone a repository with all remotely tracked branches?

  • 5
    You know this actually seems to be a pretty good answer even though it has no votes. Are there any pitfalls to doing it that way? I had to explicitly checkout a branch after running those commands. – loop Jan 12 '12 at 4:25
  • 22
    This combined with git push --mirror are exactly what I needed to create an exact duplicate of a remote git repo when moving from github.com to a github enterprise install. Thanks! – Jacob Fike Sep 11 '12 at 22:59
  • 3
    @Dave: Add a final git checkout as last command to finally checkout the head of the current branch on the cloned repo. This is a great answer, by far the best. Be brave, eventually we'll get you to the top :-) – cfi Sep 18 '12 at 7:37
  • 3
    @Dave: Hm. I'm having second thoughts: --mirror does more than just setting up all branches as being tracked. It copies all refs from the origin and subsequent git remote update will do that again. Behaviour of pulls change. I'm back to believing the full copy requires a one-line script. – cfi Sep 18 '12 at 11:53
  • 5
    git clone --mirror is very good for backing up your git repositories ^_^ – TrinitronX May 20 '13 at 21:19

You can easily switch to a branch without using the fancy "git checkout -b somebranch origin/somebranch" syntax. You can just do:

git checkout somebranch

Git will automatically do the right thing:

$ git checkout somebranch
Branch somebranch set up to track remote branch somebranch from origin.
Switched to a new branch 'somebranch'

Git will check whether a branch with the same name exists in exactly one remote, and if it does, it tracks it the same way as if you had explicitly specified that it's a remote branch. From the git-checkout man page of Git 1.8.2.1:

If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as equivalent to

$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  • 1
    So, if the name of the branch you checkout is the identical to the name of the remote branch, everything after the "/", then git will create a branch of the same name, everything after the "/", "tracking" that remote? And by tracking, we mean: git push, git pull, etc. will be done on that remote? If this is correct, then expand on your answer with more information, because I aggree with @Daniel, this answer deserves more rep. – Gerard Roche Jun 14 '12 at 22:08
  • 5
    @BullfrogBlues, the answer to all your questions appears to be yes (I'm using git v1.7.7.4). I agree this behavior should be better known. (It's not in the manual for this version of git.) I actually don't like this behavior, I'd rather get an error and have to say git checkout --track origin/somebranch explicitly. – dubiousjim Jul 3 '12 at 13:05
  • 3
    @dubiousjim: Actually, this is in the manual. git-checkout(1) says: "If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as equivalent to 'git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>' " (Git V.1.8.1.1). – sleske Feb 27 '13 at 9:01
  • What we need is $ git pull * <remote>/* - where "*" is a wildcard, so it pulls all branches, including those not yet on the local system. How to do this? Are we really supposed to checkout/pull every branch just to get the code pulled to our local system? – JosephK Feb 19 '17 at 5:27

Regarding,

$ git checkout -b experimental origin/experimental

using

$ git checkout -t origin/experimental

or the more verbose but easier to remember

$ git checkout --track origin/experimental

might be better, in terms of tracking a remote repository.

The fetch that you are doing should get all the remote branches, but it won't create local branches for them. If you use gitk, you should see the remote branches described as "remotes/origin/dev" or something similar.

To create a local branch based on a remote branch, do something like:

git checkout -b dev refs/remotes/origin/dev

Which should return something like:

Branch dev set up to track remote branch refs/remotes/origin/dev.
Switched to a new branch "dev"

Now, when you are on the dev branch, "git pull" will update your local dev to the same point as the remote dev branch. Note that it will fetch all branches, but only pull the one you are on to the top of the tree.

  • 14
    You don't need refs/remotes here. git checkout -b dev origin/dev will work fine. – emk Sep 17 '08 at 13:10
  • 3
    This will always work: git checkout -b newlocaldev --track origin/dev. If you want the local branch has the same name as the remote one, and the remote one doesn't have a tricky name, you can omit the -b newlocaldev. With the default branch.autosetupmerge config setting, and assuming you don't have a local branch named dev, these two commands may do the same thing: git checkout -b dev origin/dev and just plain git checkout dev. Finally, git checkout origin/dev doesn't create a new branch, but just puts you in detached HEAD state. – dubiousjim Jul 3 '12 at 13:27
  • What happens when the remote no longer exists but Git is too stupid to acknowledge its been deleted? This assumes you updated and git branch -a continues to lists it as a remote branch. – jww Sep 19 '16 at 22:14
  • And we do this for dozens of branches? – JosephK Feb 19 '17 at 5:28

When you do "git clone git://location", all branches and tags are fetched.

In order to work on top of a specific remote branch, assuming it's the origin remote:

git checkout -b branch origin/branchname
  • I appreciate your note "all branches and tags are fetched". I was going to comment on your answer being wrong, but then I checked it and found, you are perfectly right. So in a way, you have provided the shortest answer - if you cloned, you already have it. Nice. One could try to add: try $ git branch -a to learn, what remote branches are already available. – Jan Vlcinsky Nov 17 '13 at 22:39

Use aliases. Though there aren't any native Git one-liners, you can define your own as

git config --global alias.clone-branches '! git branch -a | sed -n "/\/HEAD /d; /\/master$/d; /remotes/p;" | xargs -L1 git checkout -t'

and then use it as

git clone-branches

This isn't too much complicated, very simple and straight forward steps are as follows;

git fetch origin This will bring all the remote branches to your local.

git branch -a This will show you all the remote branches.

git checkout --track origin/<branch you want to checkout>

Verify whether you are in the desired branch by the following command;

git branch

The output will like this;

*your current branch 
some branch2
some branch3 

Notice the * sign that denotes the current branch.

  • 1
    Thanks suraj. The reason because its not been voted much. And the ans is not accepted by the questioner. – Sam Jun 8 '15 at 11:03
  • The "git fetch origin" did not bring any of the remote branches to my local - or are they hidden somewhere? Reading all the answers above gave me a headache. We are looking for "git fetch all branches to local". There must be a way aside from bash-scripts to do this. – JosephK May 2 '16 at 6:12
  • 1
    Just after you execute "git fetch origin", it will show the output like this in your terminal - "* [new branch] branch_name -> origin/branch_name", but when you run "git branch" it will show you only your local branches instead, so to see all the branches you can do "git branch -a" and then to switch to the remote branch you need to run " git checkout --track origin/<branch you want to checkout>". Hope this helps. :-) – Sam Jun 9 '16 at 4:24
  • 2
    Suraj, because the question was, how to "clone all remote branches" - not how to manually update one at a time. It appears there is no answer to the actual question - just ways to do a whole lot of typing if you have a lot of branches. – JosephK Feb 19 '17 at 7:38
  • It worked for me. Thanks buddy !! – Jagdish N Apr 17 '17 at 9:36

Why you only see "master"

git clone downloads all remote remote branches but still considers them "remote", even though the files are located in your new repository. There's one exception to this, which is that the cloning process creates a local branch called "master" from the remote branch called "master". By default, git branch only shows local branches, which is why you only see "master".

git branch -a shows all branches, including remote branches.


How to get local branches

If you actually want to work on a branch, you'll probably want a "local" version of it. To simply create local branches from remote branches (without checking them out and thereby changing the contents of your working directory), you can do that like this:

git branch branchone origin/branchone
git branch branchtwo origin/branchtwo
git branch branchthree origin/branchthree

In this example, branchone is the name of a local branch you're creating based on origin/branchone; if you instead want to create local branches with different names, you can do this:

git branch localbranchname origin/branchone

Once you've created a local branch, you can see it with git branch (remember, you don't need -a to see local branches).

  • 1
    Thanks for the explanation of why only master is the only visible branch – AguThadeus Mar 28 at 11:39

Better late than never, but here is the best way to do this:

mkdir repo
cd repo
git clone --bare path/to/repo.git .git
git config --unset core.bare
git reset --hard

At this point you have a complete copy of the remote repo with all of it's branches (verify with git branch). You can use --mirror instead of --bare if your remote repo has remotes of its own.

  • Something went wrong during the edits here. Now this answer doesn't make sense. The "--bare" mentioned in the last sentence doesn't exist in the given command list. – Cerran Mar 5 '14 at 13:11
  • taking from Dave's answer below. Using 'git config --bool core.bare false' instead of 'git config unset core.bare' seems to do the job. – Confused Vorlon Oct 28 '14 at 12:25
  • I have the error: key does not contain a section: unset. The Dave's answer works better. – olibre Oct 19 '15 at 9:24
  • It's git config --unset core.bare actually... To me, this seems the cleanest solution of all presented in the answers here. A pity it has so few upvotes... – Dirk Hillbrecht May 10 '17 at 8:05
  • 1
    Thanks @ChrisSim I agree for git config --bool core.bare false. This is why I recommend instead the Dave's answer. What do you think about the Dave's answer? Cheers – olibre Jun 29 '17 at 8:24

Just do this:

$ git clone git://example.com/myproject
$ cd myproject
$ git checkout branchxyz
Branch branchxyz set up to track remote branch branchxyz from origin.
Switched to a new branch 'branchxyz'
$ git pull
Already up-to-date.
$ git branch
* branchxyz
  master
$ git branch -a
* branchxyz
  master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/branchxyz
  remotes/origin/branch123

You see, 'git clone git://example.com/myprojectt' fetches everything, even the branches, you just have to checkout them, then your local branch will be created.

A git clone is supposed to copy the entire repository. Try cloning it, and then run git branch -a. It should list all the branches. If then you want to switch to branch "foo" instead of "master", use git checkout foo.

  • 1
    You can run git commands with or without the hyphen. Both "git-branch" and "git branch" will work. – Peter Boughton Sep 15 '08 at 22:55
  • 13
    Maybe this answer was given a long time ago when git worked differently, but I think it's misleading today. git clone does download all the remote branches, but it only makes a local branch of master. Since git branch only shows local branches, you need git branch -a to see remote branches, too. – Cerran Mar 5 '14 at 13:05
  • Thank you. This is kind of strange default behavior IMO. I'll just chalk it up to more cryptic gitness. If it downloaded the branches, why would it hide them when calling git branch? – Adam Hughes Oct 26 '16 at 14:27
  • @Cerran, thanks; I've updated my answer accordingly. – MattoxBeckman Oct 28 '17 at 15:34
  • "does download all the remote branches, but it only makes a local branch of master". I need help understanding this. It seems git clone does NOT clone any branches except master, as when you do "git branch -a" it shows that the "develop" branch is only at "remotes/origin/develop". This must be saying that you dont have this branch anywhere locally, it only exists currently on the origin right? – John Little Jan 23 at 10:47

You only need to use "git clone" to get all branches.

git clone <your_http_url>

Even though you only see master branch, you can use "git branch -a" to see all branches.

git branch -a

And you can switch to any branch which you already have.

git checkout <your_branch_name>

Don't worry that after you "git clone", you don't need to connect with the remote repo, "git branch -a" and "git checkout " can be run successfully when you close your wifi. So it is proved that when you do "git clone", it already has copied all branches from the remote repo. After that, you don't need the remote repo, your local already has all branches' codes.

Use my tool git_remote_branch (you need Ruby installed on your machine). It's built specifically to make remote branch manipulations dead easy.

Each time it does an operation on your behalf, it prints it in red at the console. Over time, they finally stick into your brain :-)

If you don't want grb to run commands on your behalf, just use the 'explain' feature. The commands will be printed to your console instead of executed for you.

Finally, all commands have aliases, to make memorization easier.

Note that this is alpha software ;-)

Here's the help when you run grb help:

git_remote_branch version 0.2.6

  Usage:

  grb create branch_name [origin_server] 

  grb publish branch_name [origin_server] 

  grb rename branch_name [origin_server] 

  grb delete branch_name [origin_server] 

  grb track branch_name [origin_server] 



  Notes:
  - If origin_server is not specified, the name 'origin' is assumed 
    (git's default)
  - The rename functionality renames the current branch

  The explain meta-command: you can also prepend any command with the 
keyword 'explain'. Instead of executing the command, git_remote_branch 
will simply output the list of commands you need to run to accomplish 
that goal.

  Example: 
    grb explain create
    grb explain create my_branch github

  All commands also have aliases:
  create: create, new
  delete: delete, destroy, kill, remove, rm
  publish: publish, remotize
  rename: rename, rn, mv, move
  track: track, follow, grab, fetch
  • 5
    Word to the wise: It looks like this project was abandoned around the time this answer was posted. I can't find any updates after 2008. Caveat emptor and all that. If I'm wrong, I hope someone will edit and provide a current pointer, because I'd love to have a tool like this handy. – bradheintz Apr 27 '11 at 21:53

all the answers I saw here are valid but there is a much cleaner way to clone a repository and to pull all the branches at once.

When you clone a repository all the information of the branches is actually downloaded but the branches are hidden. With the command

$ git branch -a

you can show all the branches of the repository, and with the command

$ git checkout -b branchname origin/branchname

you can then "download" them manually one at a time.


However, when you want to clone a repo with a lot of branches all the ways illustrated are above are lengthy and tedious in respect to a much cleaner and quicker way that I am going to show, though it's a bit complicated. You need three steps to accomplish this:

  1. First step

create a new empty folder on your machine and clone a mirror copy of the .git folder from the repository:

$ cd ~/Desktop && mkdir my_repo_folder && cd my_repo_folder
$ git clone --mirror https://github.com/planetoftheweb/responsivebootstrap.git .git

the local repository inside the folder my_repo_folder is still empty, there is just a hidden .git folder now that you can see with a "ls -alt" command from the terminal.

  1. Second step

switch this repository from an empty (bare) repository to a regular repository by switching the boolean value "bare" of the git configurations to false:

$ git config --bool core.bare false
  1. Third Step

Grab everything that inside the current folder and create all the branches on the local machine, therefore making this a normal repo.

$ git reset --hard

So now you can just type the command "git branch" and you can see that all the branches are downloaded.

This is the quick way in which you can clone a git repository with all the branches at once, but it's not something you wanna do for every single project in this way.

Looking at one of answers to the question I noticed that it's possible to shorten it:

for branch in  `git branch -r | grep -v 'HEAD\|master'`; do  
 git branch --track ${branch##*/} $branch;
done

But beware, if one of remote branches is named as e.g. admin_master it won't get downloaded!

Thanks to bigfish for original idea

  • You can improve the regex, or maybe use Awk instead of grep, to improve the filter to avoid false positives. – tripleee Nov 4 '15 at 12:37
  • all the branches are 'origin\my_branch_name', which is not definitely what I want. – Sнаđошƒаӽ Sep 1 '16 at 17:49
  • I've not seen the construct ${branch##*/} before - looks really useful - any idea where I can find out more on that? can't seem to find under bash anywhere. Thx. – SaminOz May 7 '17 at 11:44

OK, when you clone your repo, you have all branches there...

If you just do git branch, they are kind of hidden...

So if you'd like to see all branches name, just simply add --all flag like this:

git branch --all or git branch -a

If you just checkout to the branch, you get all you need.

But how about if the branch created by someone else after you clone?

In this case, just do:

git fetch

and check all branches again...

If you like to fetch and checkout at the same time, you can do:

git fetch && git checkout your_branch_name

Also created the image below for you to simplify what I said:

git branch --all to get all branches

  • There is a difference between "you have it" and "you see it". git branch -all will NOT list the remote branches any more when you remove the remote repository. – Gustave Mar 1 at 11:23

For copy-paste into command line:

git checkout master ; remote=origin ; for brname in `git branch -r | grep $remote | grep -v master | grep -v HEAD | awk '{gsub(/^[^\/]+\//,"",$1); print $1}'`; do git branch -D $brname ; git checkout -b $brname $remote/$brname ; done ; git checkout master

For more readibility:

git checkout master ;
remote=origin ;
for brname in `
    git branch -r | grep $remote | grep -v master | grep -v HEAD 
    | awk '{gsub(/^[^\/]+\//,"",$1); print $1}'
`; do
    git branch -D $brname ;
    git checkout -b $brname $remote/$brname ;
done ;
git checkout master


This will:

  1. check out master (so that we can delete branch we are on)
  2. select remote to checkout (change it to whatever remote you have)
  3. loop through all branches of the remote except master and HEAD
    1. delete local branch (so that we can check out force-updated branches)
    2. check out branch from the remote
  4. check out master (for the sake of it)

Based on answer of VonC.

#!/bin/bash
for branch in `git branch -a | grep remotes | grep -v HEAD | grep -v master `; do
   git branch --track ${branch#remotes/origin/} $branch
done

These code will pull all remote branches code to local repo.

I needed to do exactly the same. Here is my Ruby script.

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

local = []
remote = {}

# Prepare
%x[git reset --hard HEAD]
%x[git checkout master] # Makes sure that * is on master.
%x[git branch -a].each_line do |line|
  line.strip!
  if /origin\//.match(line)
     remote[line.gsub(/origin\//, '')] = line
   else
     local << line
   end
end
# Update 
remote.each_pair do |loc, rem|
  next if local.include?(loc)
  %x[git checkout --track -b #{loc} #{rem}]
end
%x[git fetch]

Cloning from a local repo will not work with git clone & git fetch: a lot of branches/tags will remain unfetched.

To get a clone with all branches and tags.

git clone --mirror git://example.com/myproject myproject-local-bare-repo.git

To get a clone with all branches and tags but also with a working copy:

git clone --mirror git://example.com/myproject myproject/.git
cd myproject
git config --unset core.bare
git config receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead
git checkout master

I wrote this small Powershell functions to be able to checkout all my git branches, that are on origin remote.

Function git-GetAllRemoteBranches {
     iex "git branch -r"                       <# get all remote branches #> `
     | % { $_ -Match "origin\/(?'name'\S+)" }  <# select only names of the branches #> `
     | % { Out-Null; $matches['name'] }        <# write does names #>
}


Function git-CheckoutAllBranches {
    git-GetAllRemoteBranches `
        | % { iex "git checkout $_" }          <# execute ' git checkout <branch>' #>
}

More git functions can be found on my git settings repo

Use commands that you can remember

I'm using Bitbucket, a Repository Hosting Service of Atlassian. So I try to follow their docs. And that works perfectly for me. With the following easy and short commands you can checkout your remote branch.

At first clone your repository, then change into the destination folder. And last but not least fetch and checkout:

git clone <repo> <destination_folder>
cd <destination_folder>
git fetch && git checkout <branch>

That's it. Here a litte more real world example:

git clone https://username@bitbucket.org/team/repository.git project_folder
cd project_folder
git fetch && git checkout develop

You will find detail information about the commands in the docs: Clone Command, Fetch Command, Checkout Command

Git usually (when not specified) fetches all branches and/or tags (refs, see: git ls-refs) from one or more other repositories along with the objects necessary to complete their histories. In other words it fetches the objects which are reachable by the objects that are already downloaded. See: What does git fetch really do?

Sometimes you may have branches/tags which aren't directly connected to the current one, so git pull --all/git fetch --all won't help in that case, but you can list them by:

git ls-remote -h -t origin

and fetch them manually by knowing the ref names.

So to fetch them all, try:

git fetch origin --depth=10000 $(git ls-remote -h -t origin)

The --depth=10000 parameter may help if you've shallowed repository.

Then check all your branches again:

git branch -avv

If above won't help, you need to add missing branches manually to the tracked list (as they got lost somehow):

$ git remote -v show origin
...
  Remote branches:
    master      tracked

by git remote set-branches like:

git remote set-branches --add origin missing_branch

so it may appear under remotes/origin after fetch:

$ git remote -v show origin
...
  Remote branches:
    missing_branch new (next fetch will store in remotes/origin)
$ git fetch
From github.com:Foo/Bar
 * [new branch]      missing_branch -> origin/missing_branch

Troubleshooting

If you still cannot get anything other than the master branch, check the followings:

  • Double check your remotes (git remote -v), e.g.
    • Validate that git config branch.master.remote is origin.
    • Check if origin points to the right URL via: git remote show origin (see this post).

As of early 2017, the answer in this comment works:

git fetch <origin-name> <branch-name> brings the branch down for you. While this doesn't pull all branches at once, you can singularly execute this per-branch.

None of these answers cut it, except user nobody is on the right track.

I was having trouble with moving a repo from one server/system to another. When I cloned the repo, it only created a local branch for master so when I pushed to the new remote, only master branch was pushed.

So I found these two methods VERY useful. Hope they help someone else.

Method 1:

git clone --mirror OLD_REPO_URL
cd new-cloned-project
mkdir .git
mv * .git
git config --local --bool core.bare false
git reset --hard HEAD
git remote add newrepo NEW_REPO_URL
git push --all newrepo
git push --tags newrepo

Method 2:

git config --global alias.clone-branches '! git branch -a | sed -n "/\/HEAD /d; /\/master$/d; /remotes/p;" | xargs -L1 git checkout -t'
git clone OLD_REPO_URL
cd new-cloned-project
git clone-branches
git remote add newrepo NEW_REPO_URL
git push --all newrepo
git push --tags newrepo

Here is another short one-liner command which creates local branches for all remote branches:

(git branch -r | sed -n '/->/!s#^  origin/##p' && echo master) | xargs -L1 git checkout

It works also properly if tracking local branches are already created. You can call it after the first git clone or any time later.

If you do not need to have master branch checked out after cloning, use

git branch -r | sed -n '/->/!s#^  origin/##p'| xargs -L1 git checkout

I'm going to add my 2 cents here because I got here trying to find out how to pull down a remote branch I had deleted locally. Origin was not mine, and I didn't want to go through the hassle of re-cloning everything

This worked for me:

assuming you need to recreate the branch locally:

git checkout -b recreated-branch-name
git branch -a (to list remote branches)
git rebase remotes/remote-origin/recreated-branch-name

So if I forked from gituser/master to sjp and then branched it to sjp/mynewbranch it would look like this:

$ git checkout -b mynewbranch
$ git branch -a
  master
  remotes/sjp/master
  remotes/sjp/mynewbranch
$ git fetch (habit to always do before)
$ git rebase remotes/sjp/mynewbranch

protected by NullPoiиteя Jun 10 '13 at 5:02

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.