How do I force an overwrite of local files on a git pull?

The scenario is following:

  • A team member is modifying the templates for a website we are working on
  • They are adding some images to the images directory (but forgets to add them under source control)
  • They are sending the images by mail, later, to me
  • I'm adding the images under the source control and pushing them to GitHub together with other changes
  • They cannot pull updates from GitHub because Git doesn't want to overwrite their files.

This is the error I'm getting:

error: Untracked working tree file 'public/images/icon.gif' would be overwritten by merge

How do I force Git to overwrite them? The person is a designer - usually I resolve all the conflicts by hand, so the server has the most recent version that they just needs to update on their computer.

  • 5
    anyone reading this who thinks they might lose files, I've been in this position and found Sublime Text's buffer has saved me - if I'm working on something, then accidentally delete everything by trying to solve a similar problem to this or by using an answer on this question and have had the files open in Sublime (which there's a good chance of) then the files will still be there is Sublime, either just there, or in the undo history – Toni Leigh Jan 20 '16 at 8:51
  • 2
    git reset --hard origin/branch_to_overwrite – Andrew Atkinson Mar 22 '16 at 8:37
  • basically, only do a pull from develop after the initial checkout -b. do your work, then push back in. – ldgorman Aug 22 at 9:09

37 Answers 37

up vote 7356 down vote accepted

Important: If you have any local changes, they will be lost. With or without --hard option, any local commits that haven't been pushed will be lost.[*]

If you have any files that are not tracked by Git (e.g. uploaded user content), these files will not be affected.


I think this is the right way:

git fetch --all

Then, you have two options:

git reset --hard origin/master

OR If you are on some other branch:

git reset --hard origin/<branch_name>

Explanation:

git fetch downloads the latest from remote without trying to merge or rebase anything.

Then the git reset resets the master branch to what you just fetched. The --hard option changes all the files in your working tree to match the files in origin/master


Maintain current local commits

[*]: It's worth noting that it is possible to maintain current local commits by creating a branch from master before resetting:

git checkout master
git branch new-branch-to-save-current-commits
git fetch --all
git reset --hard origin/master

After this, all of the old commits will be kept in new-branch-to-save-current-commits.

Uncommitted changes

Uncommitted changes, however (even staged), will be lost. Make sure to stash and commit anything you need. For that you can run the following:

git stash

And then to reapply these uncommitted changes:

git stash pop
  • 3
    Watch out! If you have local unpushed commits this will remove them from your branch! This solution keeps untracked files not in the repository intact, but overwrites everything else. – Matthijs P May 17 '12 at 8:18
  • 401
    It's a popular question, so I'd like to clarify on the top comment here. I just executed commands as described in this answer and it hasn't removed ALL the local files. Only the remotely tracked files were overwritten, and every local file that has been here was left untouched. – Red Nov 22 '12 at 10:38
  • 11
    This worked for me and my local files were NOT deleted. – Tastybrownies May 21 '13 at 18:16
  • 9
    in case you're pulling from a repo that has its remote branch name different from "master", use git reset --hard origin/branch-name – Nerrve Dec 17 '13 at 11:17
  • 11
    Given the amount of upvotes to this question and answer, I think that git should incorporate a command like git pull -f – Sophivorus Aug 26 '14 at 1:33

Try this:

git reset --hard HEAD
git pull

It should do what you want.

  • 11
    I've done this and some local files that were no longer in repo were left on the disk. – Piotr Owsiak Apr 8 '11 at 16:00
  • 19
    I do not think that this is correct. the above will perform a merge, not overwrite which was requested in the question: "How to force git to overwrite them?" I do not have the answer, I am currently looking for it.. at the moment I switch to the branch with with the code that I want to keep "git checkout BranchWithCodeToKeep", then do "git branch -D BranchToOverwrite" and then finally "git checkout -b BranchToOverwrite". you will now have the exact code from BranchWithCodeToKeep on the branch BranchToOverwrite without having to perform a merge. – felbus Jul 13 '11 at 10:11
  • 227
    instead of merging using 'git pull', try git fetch --all followed by 'git reset --hard origin/master' – Lloyd Moore Feb 21 '12 at 14:56
  • 4
    yep, the @lloydmoore solution worked for me. Could do with being an answer rather than just a comment. – Max Williams Nov 19 '12 at 9:54
  • 1
    This will reset the current changes back to the last branch commit pulled. Then git pull merges the changes from the latest branch. This did exactly what I wanted it to do.. Thanks! – Codeversed Dec 5 '14 at 17:42

WARNING: git clean deletes all your untracked files/directories and can't be undone.


Sometimes just clean -f does not help. In case you have untracked DIRECTORIES, -d option also needed:

# WARNING: this can't be undone!

git reset --hard HEAD
git clean -f -d
git pull

WARNING: git clean deletes all your untracked files/directories and can't be undone.

Consider using -n (--dry-run) flag first. This will show you what will be deleted without actually deleting anything:

git clean -n -f -d

Example output:

Would remove untracked-file-1.txt
Would remove untracked-file-2.txt
Would remove untracked/folder
...
  • 29
    Awesome... Ran this against my dotfiles repo... In my home directory. Good that I didn't really have anything important there... – Lauri Dec 11 '11 at 10:35
  • 5
    I think the scenario description makes it clear that he doesn't really want to throw away the content. Rather what he wants is to stop git baulking at overwriting the files. @Lauri, this should not have happened to you. Unfortunately people seem to have misread the essence of scenario description - see my suggestion. – Hedgehog Feb 11 '12 at 23:05
  • 14
    FINALLY. git clean -f -d is handy when make clean fails to clean everything. – earthmeLon Jun 23 '12 at 4:32
  • 7
    @crizCraig unless they are added in .gitignore – Bleeding Fingers Jun 13 '13 at 6:58
  • 3
    @earthmeLon, for that you might want git clean -dfx. The -x ignores .gitignore. Typically your build products will be in .gitignore. – Paul Draper Aug 12 '15 at 18:28

Like Hedgehog I think the answers are terrible. But though Hedgehog's answer might be better, I don't think it is as elegant as it could be. The way I found to do this is by using "fetch" and "merge" with a defined strategy. Which should make it so that your local changes are preserved as long as they are not one of the files that you are trying to force an overwrite with.

First do a commit of your changes

 git add *
 git commit -a -m "local file server commit message"

Then fetch the changes and overwrite if there is a conflict

 git fetch origin master
 git merge -s recursive -X theirs origin/master

"-X" is an option name, and "theirs" is the value for that option. You're choosing to use "their" changes, instead of "your" changes if there is a conflict.

  • 52
    This is the best answer I've seen so far. I haven't tried it, but unlike other answers, this doesn't attempt to nuke all your untracked files, which is very dangerous for obvious reasons. – huyz May 7 '12 at 9:36
  • 4
    Ditto - this worked for me when doing a very large merge (GitHub pull request) where I just wanted to accept it all on top of what I had. Good answer! In my case the last two commands were: 1) get fetch other-repo; 2) git merge -s recursive -X theirs other-repo/master – quux00 Jul 27 '12 at 1:44
  • 4
    Question: What is -X? What is 'theirs'? – AlxVallejo Nov 21 '14 at 14:50
  • 2
    This will overwrite any conflicts with the repositories files and not your local ones, correct? – Nathan Fiscaletti Dec 5 '14 at 11:40
  • 5
    "-X" is an option name, and "theirs" is the value for that option. You're choosing to use "their" changes, instead of "your" changes if there is a conflict. – Richard Kersey Aug 21 '15 at 21:51

Instead of doing:

git fetch --all
git reset --hard origin/master

I'd advise doing the following:

git fetch origin master
git reset --hard origin/master

No need to fetch all remotes and branches if you're going to reset to the origin/master branch right?

  • 3
    Your answer is just what you needed for your rep. I must ask, does this also remove all untracked files? – Nicolas De Jay Jan 7 '14 at 6:38
  • 5
    Yeah, most of my rep is coming from here :) This will also remove all untracked files. Something I had forgotten and was painfully reminded of just 2 days ago... – Johanneke Jan 9 '14 at 12:01
  • 1
    See the comments on this other answer: stackoverflow.com/a/8888015/2151700 – Johanneke Jan 9 '14 at 12:02
  • This did not remove my untracked files; which is actually what I'd expect. Is there a reason it might for some people and not for others? – arichards Apr 19 '16 at 15:27
  • Untracked files are not affect4ed by git reset. If you want them to be removed as well, do git add . first, before git reset --hard – Johanneke Aug 15 '17 at 9:12

It looks like the best way is to first do:

git clean

To delete all untracked files and then continue with the usual git pull...

  • 3
    I tried using "git clean" to solve the same issue, but it did not resolve it. git status says "Your branch and 'origin/master' have diverged, # and have 2 and 9 different commit(s) each, respectively." and git pull says something similar to what you have above. – slacy Sep 24 '09 at 4:25
  • 34
    git clean is a rather blunt instrument, and could throw away a lot of things that you may want to keep. Better to remove or rename the files that git is complaining about until the pull succeeds. – Neil Mayhew Jul 2 '10 at 13:21
  • 1
    I do not think this works in general. Isn't there a way to do basically a git clone remote via a forced git pull? – mathtick Nov 29 '10 at 18:30
  • 8
    @mathick: git fetch origin && git reset --hard origin/master – Arrowmaster Feb 23 '11 at 4:24
  • 1
    Is git clean the best answer here? Seems like removing files isn't necessarily what the OP wants. They asked for 'an overwrite of local files' not deletion. – JohnAllen Mar 4 '14 at 8:28

Warning, doing this will permanently delete your files if you have any directory/* entries in your gitignore file.

Some answers seem to be terrible. Terrible in the sense of what happened to @Lauri by following David Avsajanishvili suggestion.

Rather (git > v1.7.6):

git stash --include-untracked
git pull

Later you can clean the stash history.

Manually, one-by-one:

$ git stash list
stash@{0}: WIP on <branch>: ...
stash@{1}: WIP on <branch>: ...

$ git stash drop stash@{0}
$ git stash drop stash@{1}

Brutally, all-at-once:

$ git stash clear

Of course if you want to go back to what you stashed:

$ git stash list
...
$ git stash apply stash@{5}
  • 1
    No I don't think so. Stashing just moves uncommitted files out of the way. The above also moves (stashes) files that git does not track. This prevents files that have been added to the remote, which have not yet pulled down to your machine - but which you have created (!) - to be pulled down. All without destroying the uncommitted work. Hope that makes sense? – Hedgehog Mar 20 '12 at 23:54
  • 3
    If you don't have 1.7.6, you can mimic --include-untracked simply by temporarily git add-ing your entire repo, then immediately stashing it. – nategood May 1 '12 at 22:48
  • 2
    I agree with Hedgehog. If you do the popular answers here, you are more than likely going to find you've inadvertently killed a lot of stuff that you didn't really want to lose. – Guardius Jan 31 '13 at 21:28
  • 1
    I had other untracked files--besides the one the merge/pull wanted to overwrite, so this solution worked best. git stash apply brought back all my untracked files with the exception (rightly) of the ones that the merge had already created: "already exists, no checkout." Worked perfectly. – BigBlueHat Apr 25 '13 at 4:55
  • 1
    This is the cleanest answer, and should be the accepted one. To save some typing you can use the short form: git stash -u. – ccpizza Mar 23 '17 at 8:30

You might find this command helpful to throw away local changes:

git checkout <your-branch> -f

And then do a cleanup (removes untracked files from the working tree):

git clean -f

If you want to remove untracked directories in addition to untracked files:

git clean -fd
  • I think the scenario description makes it clear that he doesn't really want to throw away the content. Rather what he wants is to stop git baulking at overwriting the files. See my suggestion. – Hedgehog Feb 11 '12 at 23:03
  • 2
    Though that answer might not fit exactly the description, it still saved me from the frustration of git twiddling with the carriage returns (event with autocrlf false). When git reset --hard HEAD does not leave you with "no" modified files, these "-f" flags are quite helpful. Thanks a bunch. – Kellindil Jan 16 '13 at 10:28

Instead of merging with git pull, try this:

git fetch --all

followed by:

git reset --hard origin/master.

The only thing that worked for me was:

git reset --hard HEAD~5

This will take you back five commits and then with

git pull

I found that by looking up how to undo a Git merge.

  • This was what ultimately worked for me as I had force pushed my branch to the origin repo and kept getting merge conflicts when trying to pull it to my remote repo.. – jwfrench May 7 '14 at 5:16
  • Hi, actually this is a trick for a work around but really effective. Because some conflicts may happen just in few commits then reverting 5 commits will make sure no conflicts with remote code. – Hoang Le Nov 21 '14 at 10:03

The problem with all these solutions is that they are all either too complex, or, an even bigger problem, is that they remove all untracked files from the web server, which we don't want since there are always needed configuration files which are on the server and not in the Git repository.

Here is the cleanest solution which we are using:

# Fetch the newest code
git fetch

# Delete all files which are being added, so there
# are no conflicts with untracked files
for file in `git diff HEAD..origin/master --name-status | awk '/^A/ {print $2}'`
do
    rm -f -- "$file"
done

# Checkout all files which were locally modified
for file in `git diff --name-status | awk '/^[CDMRTUX]/ {print $2}'`
do
    git checkout -- "$file"
done

# Finally pull all the changes
# (you could merge as well e.g. 'merge origin/master')
git pull
  • The first command fetches newest data.

  • The second command checks if there are any files which are being added to the repository and deletes those untracked files from the local repository which would cause conflicts.

  • The third command checks-out all the files which were locally modified.

  • Finally we do a pull to update to the newest version, but this time without any conflicts, since untracked files which are in the repo don't exist anymore and all the locally modified files are already the same as in the repository.

  • Using "git merge origin/master" as the last line (like you say in your note) instead of "git pull" will be faster as you've already pulled down any changes from the git repo. – Josh May 6 '13 at 6:21
  • 1
    Yeah of course, git merge origin/master will be faster and probably even safer. Since if someone pushed new changes during the removal of of files of this script (which is not likely to happen, but possible), the whole pull could fail. The only reason I put pull in there is because someone might not be working on the master branch, but some other branch and I wanted the script to be universal. – Strahinja Kustudic Sep 1 '13 at 22:25
  • If you have locally created files like option files, put them in .gitignore. – Sebi Nov 21 '17 at 11:41

I had the same problem. No one gave me this solution, but it worked for me.

I solved it by:

  1. Deleting all the files. Leave just the .git directory.
  2. git reset --hard HEAD
  3. git pull
  4. git push

Now it works.

  • 1
    Same here. Sometimes only the very hard solution works, it happens often that only reset and clean are not enough somehow... – jdehaan Dec 15 '11 at 11:28

First of all, try the standard way:

git reset HEAD --hard # Remove all not committed changes

If above won't help and you don't care about your untracked files/directories (make the backup first just in case), try the following simple steps:

cd your_git_repo  # where 'your_git_repo' is your git repository folder
rm -rfv *         # WARNING: only run inside your git repository!
git pull          # pull the sources again

This will REMOVE all git files (excempt .git/ dir, where you have all commits) and pull it again.


Why git reset HEAD --hard could fail in some cases?

  1. Custom rules in .gitattributes file

    Having eol=lf rule in .gitattributes could cause git to modify some file changes by converting CRLF line-endings into LF in some text files.

    If that's the case, you've to commit these CRLF/LF changes (by reviewing them in git status), or try: git config core.autcrlf false to temporary ignore them.

  2. File system incompability

    When you're using file-system which doesn't support permission attributes. In example you have two repositories, one on Linux/Mac (ext3/hfs+) and another one on FAT32/NTFS based file-system.

    As you notice, there are two different kind of file systems, so the one which doesn't support Unix permissions basically can't reset file permissions on system which doesn't support that kind of permissions, so no matter how --hard you try, git always detect some "changes".

I had a similar problem. I had to do this:

git reset --hard HEAD
git clean -f
git pull
  • 4
    use git clean with caution – nategood Mar 30 '12 at 16:39

I summarized other answers. You can execute git pull without errors:

git fetch --all
git reset --hard origin/master
git reset --hard HEAD
git clean -f -d
git pull

Warning: This script is very powerful, so you could lose your changes.

  • 2
    This will overwrite modified files (files that were previously checked in) and it will remove untracked files (files that have never been checked in). Exactly what I was looking for, thanks! – styfle Mar 3 '16 at 16:01
  • 3
    I suspect the third line git reset --hard HEAD may be redundant; my local man page (2.6.3) say that reset in the second line git reset --hard origin/master "defaults to HEAD in all forms." – arichards Apr 19 '16 at 15:40
  • 2
    @arichards I think your suspect is right but if second line will not work(by any reason) third line work well to reset. This solution doesn't need to be optimized. I just summarized other answers. That's all. Thank you for your comment. :) – Robert Moon Apr 20 '16 at 2:12

Based on my own similar experiences, the solution offered by Strahinja Kustudic above is by far the best. As others have pointed out, simply doing hard reset will remove all the untracked files which could include lots of things that you don't want removed, such as config files. What is safer, is to remove only the files that are about to be added, and for that matter, you'd likely also want to checkout any locally-modified files that are about to be updated.

That in mind, I updated Kustudic's script to do just that. I also fixed a typo (a missing ' in the original).

#/bin/sh

# Fetch the newest code
git fetch

# Delete all files which are being added,
# so there are no conflicts with untracked files
for file in `git diff HEAD..origin/master --name-status | awk '/^A/ {print $2}'`
do
    echo "Deleting untracked file $file..."
    rm -vf "$file"
done

# Checkout all files which have been locally modified
for file in `git diff HEAD..origin/master --name-status | awk '/^M/ {print $2}'`
do
    echo "Checking out modified file $file..."
    git checkout $file
done

# Finally merge all the changes (you could use merge here as well)
git pull
  • Using "git merge origin/master" as the last line (like you say in your note) instead of "git pull" will be faster as you've already pulled down any changes from the git repo. – Josh May 6 '13 at 6:20
  • The checkout of modified files is needed, so this works 100% of times. I updated my script with that a long time ago, but forgot to update here as well. I also use it a little differently than you. I checkout files which have any type of modification, not just M, so it works all the time. – Strahinja Kustudic Sep 1 '13 at 22:48

Bonus:

In speaking of pull/fetch/merge in the previous answers, I would like to share an interesting and productive trick,

git pull --rebase

This above command is the most useful command in my Git life which saved a lot of time.

Before pushing your newly commit to server, try this command and it will automatically synchronise the latest server changes (with a fetch + merge) and will place your commit at the top in the Git log. There isn't any need to worry about manual pull/merge.

Find details in What does "git pull --rebase" do?.

I believe there are two possible causes of conflict, which must be solved separately, and as far as I can tell none of the above answers deals with both:

  • Local files that are untracked need to be deleted, either manually (safer) or as suggested in other answers, by git clean -f -d

  • Local commits that are not on the remote branch need to be deleted as well. IMO the easiest way to achieve this is with: git reset --hard origin/master (replace 'master' by whatever branch you are working on, and run a git fetch origin first)

An easier way would be to:

git checkout --theirs /path/to/file.extension
git pull origin master

This will override your local file with the file on git

It seems like most answers here are focused on the master branch; however, there are times when I'm working on the same feature branch in two different places and I want a rebase in one to be reflected in the other without a lot of jumping through hoops.

Based on a combination of RNA's answer and torek's answer to a similar question, I've come up with this which works splendidly:

git fetch
git reset --hard @{u}

Run this from a branch and it'll only reset your local branch to the upstream version.

This can be nicely put into a git alias (git forcepull) as well:

git config alias.forcepull "!git fetch ; git reset --hard @{u}"

Or, in your .gitconfig file:

[alias]
  forcepull = "!git fetch ; git reset --hard @{u}"

Enjoy!

I had the same problem and for some reason, even a git clean -f -d would not do it. Here is why: For some reason, if your file is ignored by Git (via a .gitignore entry, I assume), it still bothers about overwriting this with a later pull, but a clean will not remove it, unless you add -x.

I just solved this myself by:

git checkout -b tmp # "tmp" or pick a better name for your local changes branch
git add -A
git commit -m 'tmp'
git pull
git checkout master # Or whatever branch you were on originally
git pull
git diff tmp

where the last command gives a list of what your local changes were. Keep modifying the "tmp" branch until it is acceptable and then merge back onto master with:

git checkout master && git merge tmp

For next time, you can probably handle this in a cleaner way by looking up "git stash branch" though stash is likely to cause you trouble on the first few tries, so do first experiment on a non-critical project...

I have a strange situation that neither git clean or git reset works. I have to remove the conflicting file from git index by using the following script on every untracked file:

git rm [file]

Then I am able to pull just fine.

These four commands work for me.

git reset --hard HEAD
git checkout origin/master
git branch -D master
git checkout -b master

To check/pull after executing these commands

git pull origin master

I tried a lot but finally got success with these commands.

  • 1
    "git branch -D master" delete the branch. so be careful with it. I prefer to use "git checkout origin/master -b <new branch name>" which create a new branch with a new name and you done need 3,4 lines. Also recommended to use "git clean -f" as well. – Chand Priyankara Apr 5 '14 at 11:49

Despite the original question, the top answers can cause problems for people who have a similar problem, but don't want to lose their local files. For example, see Al-Punk and crizCraig's comments.

The following version commits your local changes to a temporary branch (tmp), checks out the original branch (which I'm assuming is master) and merges the updates. You could do this with stash, but I've found it's usually easier to simply use the branch / merge approach.

git checkout -b tmp
git add *; git commit -am "my temporary files"
git checkout master

git fetch origin master
git merge -s recursive -X theirs origin master

where we assume the other repository is origin master.

Just do

git fetch origin branchname
git checkout -f origin/branchname // This will overwrite ONLY new included files
git checkout branchname
git merge origin/branchname

So you avoid all unwanted side effects, like deleting files or directories you wanted to keep, etc.

Reset the index and the head to origin/master, but do not reset the working tree:

git reset origin/master
  • I personally found this to be most useful. It then keeps your working tree so you can check it in again. For my issue, I had the same files deleted as being added so it was stuck. Weird, I know. – Jason Sebring Jan 4 '14 at 21:03

I know a much more easier and less painful method:

$ git branch -m [branch_to_force_pull] tmp
$ git fetch
$ git checkout [branch_to_force_pull]
$ git branch -D tmp

That's it!

I read through all the answers but I was looking for a single command to do this. Here is what I did. Added a git alias to .gitconfig

[alias]
      fp = "!f(){ git fetch ${1} ${2} && git reset --hard ${1}/${2};};f"

Run your command as

git fp origin master

equivalent to

git fetch origin master
git reset --hard origin/master

Requirements:

  1. Track local changes so no-one here ever loses them.
  2. Make the local repository match the remote origin repository.

Solution:

  1. Stash the local changes.
  2. Fetch with a clean of files and directories ignoring .gitignore and hard reset to origin.

    git stash --include-untracked
    git fetch --all
    git clean -fdx
    git reset --hard origin/master
    

protected by Paul Sasik Sep 30 '13 at 14:52

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.