Breaking NewsPreferencesContributeLink UsSearchAboutJobsPR
Linux Today [Your Linux News Source] To internet.com


  internet.com

Internet News
Internet Investing
Internet Technology
Windows Internet Tech.
Linux/Open Source
Web Developer
ECommerce/Marketing
ISP Resources
ASP Resources
Wireless Internet
Downloads
Internet Resources
Internet Lists
International
EarthWeb
Career Resources

Search internet.com
Advertising Info
Corporate Info

:Wall Street Journal: Court Ruling Was No Victory For Microsoft
Wall Street Journal: Court Ruling Was No Victory For Microsoft
Jul 8, 2001, 12 :00 UTC (31 Talkback[s]) (9718 reads)
(Other stories by Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr)

[ Thanks to Greg Abbott for this link. ]

When the Wall Street Journal says you're an evil monopoly, you're an evil monopoly. Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr (yes, the Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr) write:

"While trumpeting last week's 'victory' in the Court of Appeals, Microsoft executives would do well to recall the words of King Pyrrhus after his famous battle with the Romans: 'One more such victory and we are lost.' The truth behind the spin is that Microsoft's victory was not even pyrrhic. A quotation from George Armstrong Custer would be more appropriate, if only he'd been available for a press conference after Little Big Horn. The government won on the central issue in the case: Microsoft was held to have monopolized the operating-system market in violation of the Sherman Act."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Linux Journal: The Appeals Court Ruling: What's in it for Linux?(Jul 04, 2001)
Globe and Mail: U.S. poll indicates Microsoft support(Jul 03, 2001)
Wall Street Journal: Savvy tech entrepreneurs stay out of Microsoft's way(Jul 03, 2001)
A look at Microsoft's grass-roots campaign against anti-trust sanctions (Jul 02, 2001)
NYTimes: The Land of Monopolies(Jul 01, 2001)
AP: Microsoft Rules Out Settlement(Jun 30, 2001)
NYTimes: Microsoft Case Back in Play, and the Lobbying Heats Up(Jun 30, 2001)
Microsoft to Make a Deal? A Collection of News on Yesterday's Ruling.(Jun 29, 2001)
UPDATED: internetnews.com: Microsoft Break-up Overturned(Jun 28, 2001)

BRU Pro 2.0
BRU-Pro Description: BRU-Pro[tm], provides backup and recovery services on medium to large heterogeneous network systems. Implemented on a Linux tape server, BRU-Pro delivers market leading reliable data protection and "makes ...
Get it from Linux Central The /root. for Linux Resources
  Current Newswire:
I, Cringely: What Lies Beneath

The Register: Dude, You've Got Selective Amnesia!

iTweb: There's Something Fishy/Fantastic About Freeware

Practical Technology: SCO Linux/Unix Licensing Nonsense

Sydney Morning Herald: Would You Like Source With That?

NewsFactor: Battle of the Open Source Databases

Program Notes for Linux Today

Release Digest: KDE, January 17, 2003

Release Digest: GNOME, January 17, 2003

The Age: A Developer's Nightmare

 Talkback(s)Name Date
> In any case, Microsoft is hardly a leading innovator. It bought the
> technol ...   Yes! Yes! Yes!   
Joey Jo-Jo Johnson Shabadoo  Jul 8, 2001, 13:05:53
It's interesting to see how the media puts its spin on who won what wnd wher ...   put it that way and I can sleep better   
steel  Jul 8, 2001, 13:33:00
Their talkbacks start with a troll referring to Messrs. Robert Bork and Kenneth  ...   Trolls   
Ed Craig  Jul 8, 2001, 14:48:59
Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr are Republican appointees who are consistently con ...   Two conservative judges   
John Sowa  Jul 8, 2001, 14:53:47
> Their talkbacks start with a troll referring to Messrs. Robert Bork and Kennet ...   Re: Trolls   
Kevin Reichard  Jul 8, 2001, 14:54:53
> Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr are Republican appointees who are consistently c ...   Re: Two conservative judges   
Kevin Reichard  Jul 8, 2001, 14:56:50
I agree with the article and like most Linux Today readers I was amazed
at how  ...   ProComp lawyers   
hey  Jul 8, 2001, 15:03:42
> > Their talkbacks start with a troll referring to Messrs. Robert Bork and Kenn ...   Re: Re: Trolls   
Ed Craig  Jul 8, 2001, 15:31:44
And, of course, let's not forget Jackson....
The guy was a Reagan appointee ...   Re: Two conservative judges   
David Acklam  Jul 8, 2001, 18:46:47
My immediate reaction is: For these two ultra conservative, ultra pro-business j ...   Re: Re: Two conservative judges   
W. Wayne Liauh  Jul 8, 2001, 19:09:15
Bork and Starr are two high-power names representing ProComp, the 
anti-Microso ...   Bork and Starr are biased   
MAXOMENOS  Jul 8, 2001, 19:25:59
The article is well written, but, those two are paid for this. That could indica ...   Well written, but they are paid.   
Brandioch Conner  Jul 8, 2001, 19:40:33

> > Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr are Republican appointees who are consistent ...   Re: Re: Two conservative judges   
Eric Laffoon  Jul 8, 2001, 20:19:30
> I agree with the article and like most Linux Today readers I was amazed
> at  ...   Re: ProComp lawyers   
James  Jul 8, 2001, 20:59:46
It seems that most of the responses to the article at the WSJ site are either fr ...   article talkbacks   
kws  Jul 8, 2001, 22:56:30
Robert Bork was, at one point, being paid by Netscape.  I recall seeing him on t ...   Bork was paid by Netscape   
J  Jul 8, 2001, 23:19:51
A couple of thoughts:
Though true that Bork is representing a group opposed to  ...   Great Admiration for Bork   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)  Jul 9, 2001, 01:11:16
> Robert Bork was, at one point, being paid by Netscape.  I recall seeing him on ...   Re: Bork was paid by Netscape   
James  Jul 9, 2001, 02:05:07
I hope some of the intelligent LT readers will add their comments on that site.
 ...   Re: article talkbacks   
Howard B. Golden  Jul 9, 2001, 02:18:13
I don't get it.  All these so called conservative free marketeers criticizin ...   Response to WSJ Talkbacks   
Gary edwards  Jul 9, 2001, 03:26:37
> You should realize that OpinionJournal.com doesn't publish all comments    ...   Re: Re: article talkbacks   
R.L.  Jul 9, 2001, 05:17:53
"Whatever happened to the Rule of Law?"

Well, it was found to be less than fi ...   Re: Response to WSJ Talkbacks   
Brandioch Conner  Jul 9, 2001, 06:27:52
> Do conservatives now stand for Darwinian eat or be eaten, survival of the fitt ...   Re: Response to WSJ Talkbacks   
Bobby D. Bryant  Jul 9, 2001, 08:51:05
I tried to respond to some of the talkbacks on this site (one of which was extol ...   irony   
johna  Jul 9, 2001, 12:54:20
are what moves government.  Contrary to popular belief there are many public ser ...   Money and Convictions ...   
George Mitchell  Jul 9, 2001, 15:34:41
So, do you really suppose that these two well-respected (outside of some liberal ...   Re: ProComp   
AJWM  Jul 9, 2001, 17:21:55
> The fact is, as Dean has repeatedly pointed out, there are numerous well 

G ...   Re: Money and Convictions ...   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)  Jul 9, 2001, 17:50:53
I'm a newspaper editor, and one of the banes of my existence is people screa ...   Of course they're biased, it's an opinion   
Peter Frank  Jul 9, 2001, 21:09:12
> > The fact is, as Dean has repeatedly pointed out, there are numerous well 
> ...   Re: Re: Money and Convictions ...   
Rufus Polson  Jul 9, 2001, 21:25:21
> Actually, that saying has recently been updated.  I believe it now goes "Give  ...   Re: Re: Re: Money and Convictions ...   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)  Jul 9, 2001, 22:04:25
> Trite and shallow comments like "punishing success" and "competitors who can&# ...   Re: Subject: Response to WSJ Talkbacks   
George Mitchell  Jul 10, 2001, 03:56:57
Enter your comments below.
Your Name: Your Email Address:


Subject: CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]
Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Site DigestsNewslettersMedia KitSecurityTriggersLogin


All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP
Copyright 2003 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices,  Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions,  Privacy Policy.
http://www.internet.com/